Principles of Good Design

Is beauty objectively true? Are there principles you can use to guide you to it in your work? Can designers from both the sciences and the arts look at each others work and find beauty? These are important questions for designers of all types.

For those of us who design things … we need to be able to recognize it. We need good taste to make good things. Instead of treating beauty as an airy abstraction, to be either blathered about or avoided depending on how one feels about airy abstractions, let’s try considering it as a practical question: how do you make good stuff?

That’s programmer Paul Graham from his article Taste for Makers. Here’s my edited version of his principles for good design. What you need to make good stuff. I’m posting them here for my own benefit, as a note-taking exercise, and maybe yours if you don’t want to read the original. But you should.

  • Good design is simple. For architects and designers it means that beauty should depend on a few carefully chosen structural elements rather than a profusion of superficial ornament. When you’re forced to be simple, you’re forced to face the real problem. When you can’t deliver ornament, you have to deliver substance.
  • Good design is timeless. If something is ugly, it can’t be the best solution. There must be a better one, and eventually someone will discover it. If you can imagine someone surpassing you, you should do it yourself.
  • Good design solves the right problem. The typical stove has four burners arranged in a square, and a dial to control each. How do you arrange the dials? The simplest answer is to put them in a row. But this is a simple answer to the wrong question. The dials are for humans to use, and if you put them in a row, the unlucky human will have to stop and think each time about which dial matches which burner. Better to arrange the dials in a square like the burners.
  • Good design is suggestive. In architecture and design, this principle means that a building or object should let you use it how you want: a good building, for example, will serve as a backdrop for whatever life people want to lead in it, instead of making them live as if they were executing a program written by the architect.
  • Good design is often slightly funny. This one may not always be true. Good design may not have to be funny, but it’s hard to imagine something that could be called humorless also being good design.
  • Good design is hard. In art, the highest place has traditionally been given to paintings of people. There is something to this. If you draw a tree and you change the angle of a branch five degrees, no one will know. When you change the angle of someone’s eye five degrees, people notice.
  • Good design looks easy. Like great athletes, great designers make it look easy. Mostly this is an illusion. The easy, conversational tone of good writing comes only on the eighth rewrite.
  • Good design uses symmetry. I think symmetry may just be one way to achieve simplicity, but it’s important enough to be mentioned on its own. Nature uses it a lot, which is a good sign.
  • Good design resembles nature. It’s not so much that resembling nature is intrinsically good as that nature has had a long time to work on the problem. It’s a good sign when your answer resembles nature’s.
  • Good design is redesign. It’s rare to get things right the first time. Experts expect to throw away some early work. They plan for plans to change. You should cultivate dissatisfaction.
  • Good design can copy. I think the greatest masters go on to achieve a kind of selflessness. They just want to get the right answer, and if part of the right answer has already been discovered by someone else, that’s no reason not to use it.
  • Good design is often strange. At an art school where I once studied, the students wanted most of all to develop a personal style. But if you just try to make good things, you’ll inevitably do it in a distinctive way, just as each person walks in a distinctive way. Michelangelo was not trying to paint like Michelangelo. He was just trying to paint well; he couldn’t help painting like Michelangelo.
  • Good design happens in chunks. At any given time there are a few hot topics and a few groups doing great work on them, and it’s nearly impossible to do good work yourself if you’re too far removed from one of these centers. You can push or pull these trends to some extent, but you can’t break away from them.
  • Good design is often daring. Today’s experimental error is tomorrow’s new theory. If you want to discover great new things, then instead of turning a blind eye to the places where conventional wisdom and truth don’t quite meet, you should pay particular attention to them.

The biggest takeaway? “You should cultivate dissatisfaction.” There’s no answer to the sad problem of the designer who struggles to finish a project before he hates it. In fact, it’s a blessing. If you’re not dissatisfied with your work in some way you’re not progressing. Graham closes his article with similar words. “The recipe for great work is: very exacting taste, plus the ability to gratify it.” It’s true.

9 responses to “Principles of Good Design”

  1. Reblogged this on Web Development! In Winnipeg! and commented:
    Ian summarizes his reading of an article by Paul Graham about Good Design. Check it out!

    1. Don’t forget the classic design adage: don’t be a douche, use a swoosh!

      1. That joke never gets old. 🙂

    2. If you’re going to write a post about Principles of Good Design, you ought to know better than to present the article using light text on a dark background. #worstbehavior

  2. I like it a lot. Especially “Good design looks easy”. Which reminds me of my Futurama quote: “When you do things right, people won’t be sure you’ve done anything at all”.

    I was reminded also of Bruce Mau’s incomplete manifesto for growth, of which I agree with most.

  3. […] week, Ian ponders the principles of good design, but he also writes on general best practices and other interests, like writing. If you’ve […]

  4. On the objectivity of beauty, Kant’s philosophy deals with it very elegantly:

    The beautiful is that which, apart from concepts, is represented as the Object of a universal delight.

    And I really empathize with If you’re not dissatisfied with your work in some way you’re not progressing. Bare with me while I quote Leonardo:

    The painter who entertains no doubt of his own ability, will attain very little. When the work succeeds beyond the judgement, the artist acquires nothing; but when the judgement is superior to the work, he never ceases improving…

    1. I’d be disappointed if you didn’t quote Leonardo.

  5. […] Principles of Good Design – a bunch of bullets that, ahem, “hit the mark”.  God I’m lame. On Creative Direction – hey, that’s what I do! Welie – Interaction design pattern repo Using Lean Principles for your Product Strategy – loved this.  The simplification that his Product Canvas provided was elegant and intuitive. Design in Enterprise – companies that have evolved with great design PitchEnvy – showcasing the best startup pitch decks – the devil is in the detail, people.  This stuff matters. Users Don’t Hate Change, They Hate You – okay, not exactly YOU, but read it.  Great stuff. Make More Bad Stuff – at least your making Notification Design Strategies – a great little set of tips […]

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: